As Arbitrator you can be the referee

The last Comprehensive Arbitration Training Course for Ontario ran until November 1, 2011. Demand for the course and the certification is growing so we will be offering more courses beginning June 11, 2012.  We have posted the schedule here for the next 2012 course.  The next course will run Monday to Friday for the week of June 11, 2012 with classes running from 9 AM to 5:15 PM.   The outline below is not finalized due to continuing updating of content and format but it is representative of the general order of topics and content of the course which is approved for the ADR Institute Certificate as a 40 hour arbitrator training course.  The cost of certificates from the ADR Institute are included in the registration fee as are all course materials, refreshments and five days of lunches. This program has been accredited by the Law Society for 3 hours toward the annual Professionalism Requirement as needed by Ontario lawyers and for 37 hours Substantive Requirement. You may REGISTER NOW.

1. Monday June 11, 2012, 9 AM to 5:15 PM

  • Distribution of Course Materials Book
  • Introduction to Course and Topics
  • International Arbitration
  • Other forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Contrasting Procedures of Mediation and Arbitration. How they may and may not be used together.
  • Introduction to Ontario’s Arbitration Acts
  • ADR Organizations
  • Ontario Court Procedures and Process:
  • The Rules of Civil Procedure and the Ontario Evidence Act
  • Law of Evidence including Hearsay Rules
  • Contract Law
  • Principles of Tort
  • Assessment of Damages
  • Interest and costs

2. Tuesday June 12, 2012, 9 AM to 5:15 PM

 

  • Ontario Arbitration Act, Flexible procedures, opting out of provisions
  • Powers and Procedures under the Arbitration Act
  • Court Involvement in the Arbitration Process including interim applications, appointment of Arbitrators, stay of court proceedings, jurisdictional issues and matters of law, removal of Arbitrators, court powers preserved, Appeals and applications to set aside, enforcement of Arbitration awards.
  • Changes in Ontario law regarding religion based arbitration
  • Provisions of Ontario’s Statutory Powers and Procedures Act which apply to arbitration
  • Interest on Arbitration awards (referring to Sections 127-130 of the Courts of Justice Act)

3.  Wednesday June 13, 2012, 9 AM to 5:15 PM

TEST ON ARBITRATION ACT

  • Production and Discovery of Documents
  • Role of Oral Examinations for Discovery and the danger of delay
  • Pre-Arbitration Meeting
  • Mediation during the Arbitration process
  • Family Law Arbitration amendments
  • Recent Changes in Civil Court Procedures and their impact and influence on Mediation and Arbitration
  • The Arbitration Agreement, definitions and checklist for inclusion and further Arbitration Agreements during proceedings
  • Costs awards in Arbitration
  • Initial retainer of Arbitrator, conflicts reasonable apprehension of bias, communication outside of formal meetings and hearings, Arbitrator’s fee schedule, written agreements between the Arbitrator and the parties, qualifications of the Arbitrator, Errors and Omissions Insurance and negotiating and securing payment of Arbitrator fees
  • Use of Expert Arbitrator’s specialized skills and knowledge
  • Negotiating and drafting an Arbitration Agreement:
  • The class will divide in half and each half will take a side and negotiate the terms for a construction arbitration agreement. The instructor will assist both sides in their negotiation of an agreement
  • Lawyers meet prospective new sole Arbitrator and they discuss potential appointment, conflict issues and fee arrangements. Course materials will include background of parties and dispute, resume of arbitrator and other relevant documents.
  • Procedures in a formal arbitration hearing, variations and alternatives.

9.     Thursday June 14, 2012, 9 AM to 5:15 PM

  • The Role of the Expert Witness, Independence of the expert.
  • Role play where the class members will play the role of counsel in qualifying examining, cross-examining, re-examining, and arbitrators questioning of the expert witness.
  • Two sides meet to resolve procedural issues arising in the early stages of the hearing
  • Group meetings to prepare for the Mock Arbitration
  • Procedures in a formal arbitration hearing
  • Marketing Arbitration and other ADR Service
  • Condominium Dispute Resolution
  • Sports Arbitration
  • Final Preparation for Mock Arbitration
  • Role Play for full class with Mock Arbitration. The Case of the Burning Factory. An insurance claim. Three students will play arbitrators while others in the class play the roles of parties, witnesses and Counsel teams. This will be a full hearing with evidence called following opening statements in the previous class, examination in chief, cross examination and re-examination of each witness. Closing Statements are given. Arbitrators give oral reasons for decision. Instructor comments.

5.    Friday June 15, 2012PM

  • videotape presentation including a series of Vignettes with problems at an Arbitration Hearing with Discussion of how the Arbitrator is to deal with each issue
  • Review of Various Arbitration Rules
  • International Arbitration, Ontario and Canadian Legislation plus international treaties and international associations
  • Community Dispute Arbitration
  • Onus and burden of proof
  • Discussion of procedures in different types of Hearing
  • Communication and relationship skills of arbitrator, dealing with different cultures and unequal positions of strength or knowledge. Applying fairness considerations. This will include discussion of faith based arbitration and the new regulation of family arbitration
  • Weighing evidence and reaching a decision
  • Preparing reasons for decision, writing awards, appeal and review considerations
  • Conclusions and farewell
Our Peterborough, Ontario Arbitration Hearing Room

Our Peterborough, Ontario Arbitration Hearing Room

Murray Miskin has been actively involved in arbitration as a lawyer and trainer since the 1980s and has taught arbitration courses since 1985.  He continues to be the primary arbitration instructor in Ontario with more courses to be offered in 2012.  Murray first acted as an arbitrator in 1987 when selected by two of his students who were experienced arbitrators to chair a three member tribunal for a commercial lease renewal arbitration. Since then Murray was involved in a number of construction arbitrations, employment and other commercial arbitrations, and also environmental arbitrations.  When the new Condominium Act for Ontario came into effect in 2001 bringing mandatory mediation and arbitration of all condominium disputes Murray became extensively involved in condominium arbitration.  He has arbitrated a great number of condominium disputes where he has applied his own personal experience as a condominium resident and as the first President of a large new Toronto condominium’s Board of Directors.  The Insurance Act has been amended to expand the use of private arbitration for insurance claims and disputes.  Murray is now, as a neutral, applying his 30 years of personal injury insurance law practice experience to insurance law where he can work more freely as an arbitrator now that he is no longer a Plaintiff’s lawyer. This shift from representing individuals with claims is tied in with his involvement as Vice President of Arbitration in a new national ADR training and services company beginning operations sometime in 2012.

Resolve Disputes with ADR

Alternative Dispute Resolution known as A.D.R. is a process of settling or deciding disputes outside of the traditional courtroom where a decision is made publicly by a judge and/ or a jury.  The most common forms of ADR are Mediation and Arbitration. There are other types of ADR and some forms which combine them such as Med Arb which combines mediation with arbitration. Read our post on ADR Choices to learn about more dispute resolution options.

A mediator works to help bring the parties to their own agreement. The mediator helps the parties communicate and, during the mediation, is usually the one who delivers and discusses offers and counter-offers to and from each party. Usually mediators avoid giving advice or making recommendations, but instead try to help each party see the other side’s point of view and the strengths and weaknesses of each side’s case. A mediator considers what a reasonable compromise solution is for every dispute. A mediator gets a sense of how far each party appears to be willing to go and when that point is reached in negotiations plays a vital role in helping parties consider factors necessary to settle the case or decide to reject a final offer.  Sometimes offers are kept open after the mediation date and further mediation efforts can also take place to continue the process. Mediation is most effective when it is interest based rather than rights based. That means people can come to decide to do what is in their best interest and compromise rather than keep a dispute unresolved to their detriment because of principles of who is right and who is wrong. In an interest based mediation people will compromise to end a dispute sooner and have the best result rather than fail to agree because each side thinks the law and/or truth and justice is with them. Mediation is a “win win” process where settlements are made that all parties are content to live with instead of the all or nothing result from a trial judgment or arbitrator’s award.

An Arbitrator is Like a Judge

An Arbitrator is a private judge who decides the issues in dispute based on evidence and the law as it applies to the dispute. The parties are able to choose their own judge with the qualifications they believe are needed to decide the dispute. It is rights based in the same way that court is where usually one side wins and the other loses. This ADR process may or may not require a formal hearing and evidence to be called through witnesses. Arbitration is a process with flexible rules where the parties can agree on an efficient way to get evidence to the arbitrator to form the basis for a decision resolving the dispute.  They can save on the costs of a hearing by proceeding to present evidence in a different way.  This can be very informal, efficient and different than court proceedings. When arbitration is used without planning the process for the particular dispute, it can be more costly and lose much of its advantage over court. Arbitration is a type of A.D.R. that is used when settlement can not be achieved and someone is needed to make a decision.  An Arbitrator is like an Umpire in baseball who decides issues when the parties are unable to agree. Parties may be forced to go to arbitration by an existing contract or law or they may choose to go to arbitration rather than court and make an arbitration agreement. Within arbitration there are opportunities for negotiation, mediation and settlement.  People need to be very careful when using an arbitrator to mediate a dispute if that arbitrator may end up having to decide based only on the evidence if there is no settlement.  The arbitrator must be careful in these situations to avoid being forced to disqualify themselves if there is no settlement.  The arbitrator may learn things in discussions off the record that make it impossible to fairly make a decision based on the evidence presented. In that situation the arbitrator may have to resign and a new arbitrator would be selected with added expense and delay.

We believe that most disputes can be resolved by agreement with the help of an independent facilitator who mediates between the parties or otherwise assists.  It is safer when the Arbitrator does not act as Mediator.  When you can not settle it is often preferable to have your dispute decided by a qualified and independent arbitrator rather than going to court. Arbitration is a more private process which can also be quicker than court with less chance for appeal after the decision is made. The parties can limit or eliminate the right of appeal from an arbitrator but they can not take away the right of a losing party to have a court review a decision based on lack of fairness in the process. An expert arbitrator with qualifications in a field relevant to the issues of the case is better equipped to decide a technical dispute than a judge.

For disputes between people and companies in different countries International Arbitration is generally better than court due to distrust of foreign courts (or distrust of one’s own country’s courts) and the better ability to enforce international arbitration awards under international treaties and agreements. International mediation is less common due to the difficulty of arranging it between parties who are far apart and tend to stop communication where there is a serious dispute.

There are many ADR service providers around the world.  Murray Miskin offers mediation, arbitration and other A.D.R. services in Canada and internationally.  Murray Miskin is well known in Canada as an arbitrator, trainer of arbitrators since 1985,and as a mediator. Murray has conducted a wide range of commercial arbitrations. Murray has been appointed arbitrator by Canadian and U.S. courts.  Most of Murray’s mediation work relates to personal injury, condominium, construction cases, environmental issues and a variety of insurance claims where he has expertise from over 30 years of experience as an insurance and  personal injury lawyer. Visit our website page with Murray’s C.V. for further details of qualifications and experience. Email miskinlaw@yahoo.com to inquire about our services. Check at http://adrweb.ca to see an availability schedule and for more information on Murray and other ADR professionals.

For information on Murray Miskin’s ADR services in the Toronto Canada area visit our website: http://adr.tc

For information on Murray Miskin’s international ADR services visit our website:  http://adrworks.us

Arbitration and Mediation Services

ADR Works for Canada

Welcome to adrworks.ca which is a  website of Murray H. Miskin, lawyer, arbitrator and mediator. This site features the Canadian Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) services of Murray Miskin. We provide creative dispute resolution services locally and nationally. For more information on Murray Miskin and Miskin Law Offices go to:

http://adrworks.com

We have a new Toronto focused website about ADR which is http://adr.tc

For information on our international ADR services go to:

http://adrworks.us